NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Etwa 80% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1320 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 72% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1777 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Etwa 40% höhere Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 2560
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 25% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 10117
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 497
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 57885
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 229.393
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 2082.931
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 16.561
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 134.68
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 599.217
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 16098
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 16098
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 469
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 16098 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 469 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 11 May 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 469 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA106 | GA106 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 134 | 276 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz | 735 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 360 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |