NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Environ 80% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1320 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 72% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 199.0 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2560
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 10117
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 497
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 versus 57885
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 229.393
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 2082.931
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 16.561
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 134.68
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 versus 599.217
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 versus 16098
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 versus 16098
- 4.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 versus 469
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s versus 82.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2560 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 versus 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 versus 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 versus 16098 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 versus 469 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 170 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 469 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA106 | GA106 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 276 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 735 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |