NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 2100.9x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 6957
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 630
• 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 22896
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 113.416
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 1414.794
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 6.736
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 81.206
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 417.823
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
• Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 1961

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	17107 6957
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	971 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	88251 22896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	299.369 113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4021.382 1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.778 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	188.944 81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1152.664 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22495 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22495 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 2958

Compare specifications (specs)