NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 1509.9x more texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 14345
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 14345
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 5 January 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 vs 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 vs 14345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15401 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 645 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 14345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP106 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 5 January 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 84 | 81 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |