NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 394.035
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.818 vs 174.185
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 23659
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3718
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3358
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 23659
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3718
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 20 September 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 vs 174.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21679 vs 15401
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 931 vs 645
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137055 vs 92447
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 4619.617
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 36.308
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1410.887
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14582 vs 10457
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21679 vs 15401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 931 vs 645 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137055 vs 92447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 4619.617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 vs 36.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1410.887 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14582 vs 10457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15401 | 21679 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 645 | 931 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92447 | 137055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10457 | 14582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 84 | 86 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |