NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 vs 171.616
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 vs 16.925
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1422.602 vs 1195.863
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 vs 13044
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 7164
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 vs 13044
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1110 MHz
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3552.807
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 190.723
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8604
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8604

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	371.785 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3552.807 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.212 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.723 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1422.602 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26295 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9367 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8604 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26295 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9367 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8604 30936

Compare specifications (specs)