NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 171.616
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 versus 16.925
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1422.602 versus 1195.863
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 13044
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 7164
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 13044
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 7164
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 versus 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 versus 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 7164 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 versus 3552.807
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 versus 190.723
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 versus 8604
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 versus 8604
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 versus 3552.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 versus 190.723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 versus 8604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 versus 8604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 4031.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 247.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 30936 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 118 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $999 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
