NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 24634.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
- 29.8x more pipelines: 10496 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 9.6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 2560 MB
- 13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 1934
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 388
- 25.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 7376
- 44.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 16.451
- 14.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 511.131
- 32.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 1.925
- 14.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 17.065
- 52.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 46.591
- 12.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 2602
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3104
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3316
- 12.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 2602
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3104
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 23 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 22.57 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 2560 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 vs 1934 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 388 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191350 vs 7376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 152 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 152 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26747 | 1934 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 | 388 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191350 | 7376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 1.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 17.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 46.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 2602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3316 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
Code name | GA102 | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 23 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $2,499 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 980 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $268 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 513 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 352 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 22.57 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 152 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 722.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 248 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 2560 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |