NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1122 vs 1050
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1122 vs 1050 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3072
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26733 vs 17715
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191377 vs 79714
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 3072 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26733 vs 17715 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191377 vs 79714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1122 | 1050 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17715 | 26733 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79714 | 191377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA102 |
Place in performance rating | 48 | 44 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 28300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |