NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 812
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60526 vs 59915
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60526 vs 59915 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12568 vs 11961
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12568 vs 11961 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 812 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11961 | 12568 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60526 | 59915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 4 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 181 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1499 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 95.94 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 239.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10300 million |
Compute units | 40 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |