NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 523
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 523 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12307 vs 11961
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 6269
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12307 vs 11961 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 6269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11961 | 12307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60526 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6269 | 7438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 185 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1110 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |