NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 544
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 544 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13138 vs 11961
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84868 vs 60526
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 6269
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13138 vs 11961 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 84868 vs 60526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 6269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 544 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11961 | 13138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60526 | 84868 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6269 | 7879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 183 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 259.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |