NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 320.2x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 725
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 vs 194.277
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 vs 1916.09
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 vs 17.951
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.395 vs 31.471
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 806.848 vs 545.751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 vs 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 vs 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 vs 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 vs 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 vs 545.751 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 11911
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 60604
- 6.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 11911 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 60604 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1329 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 725 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 | 15451 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 | 63932 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 | 8770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 205 | 204 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2" (5.1 cm) |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||

