NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 329.2x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 230 Watt
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 966 vs 731
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.389 vs 174.714
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.989 vs 17.305

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12285 vs 11905
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66605 vs 60568
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2525.787
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 84.388
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 806.848

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 731
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11905 12285
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	60568 66605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.389 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2525.787 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.989 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.388 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	806.848 1226.861

Compare specifications (specs)