NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 538.1x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 965 vs 735
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12051 vs 11533
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60907 vs 45938
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6242 vs 6008
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 vs 735 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12051 vs 11533 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60907 vs 45938 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6242 vs 6008 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 | 735 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12051 | 11533 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60907 | 45938 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6242 | 6008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2522.737 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 181 | 180 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 7,516 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |