NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 381.3x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 965 vs 572
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11937 vs 7225
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 20 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 vs 572 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11937 vs 7225 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78220 vs 60565
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78220 vs 60565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 | 572 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11937 | 7225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60565 | 78220 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP100 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 20 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 194 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |