NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 259.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- 4.6x more pipelines: 5888 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17813 vs 9372
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 106315 vs 32343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 10 June 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 259.4 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17813 vs 9372 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106315 vs 32343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 784
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 2572
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 vs 784 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 vs 2572 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 892 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17813 | 9372 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106315 | 32343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2572 | 3404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP106 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 10 June 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 102 | 307 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5888 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 135.4 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 259.4 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 160 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |