NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Launch date | 2023 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD107 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 62 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1605 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.36 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 128.4 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050
