NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1130 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz
  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 13490
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 64726
  • Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 1669
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 21 Jan 2020
Core clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1130 MHz
Boost clock speed 1755 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Pipelines 2560 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 vs 13490
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 vs 64726
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1788 vs 1669

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

  • Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 871 vs 630
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 224.6 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 871 vs 630

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
630
871
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14441
13490
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
74538
64726
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1788
1669
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark 630 871
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 13490
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 64726
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1788 1669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 207.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3560.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 20.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 148.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1111.648
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace RDNA 1.0
Code name AD107 Navi 10 XLE
Launch date 2023 21 Jan 2020
Place in performance rating 167 210
Launch price (MSRP) $279
Type Desktop, Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1755 MHz 1560 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 1130 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) 449.3 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) 14.38 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS 7.188 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2304
Pixel fill rate 56.16 GPixel/s 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 140.4 GTexel/s 224.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 150 Watt
Compute units 36
Transistor count 10300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 10.5 inches (267 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 96 bit 192 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6