NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Xbox One GPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Xbox One GPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 853 MHz
- 3429.4x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 40.94 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 2023 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 853 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 40.94 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Xbox One GPU
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2132 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2132 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Xbox One GPU
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Xbox One GPU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Xbox One GPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | AD107 | Durango |
Launch date | 2023 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | not rated |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 853 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 40.94 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,310 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N / A |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 68.22 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2132 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |