NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 666.7x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 603
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 10465
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 47476
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 47476 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 1788
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 1788 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 10465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 47476 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | 5536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD107 | GP104B |
Launch date | 2023 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | 290 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |