NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz
  • 666.7x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 250x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 603
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 10465
  • Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 47476
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 15 August 2016
Boost clock speed 1755 MHz vs 1645 MHz
Texture fill rate 140.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 630 vs 603
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 vs 10465
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 vs 47476

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 1788
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5536 vs 1788

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
630
603
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14441
10465
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
74538
47476
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1788
5536
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark 630 603
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 10465
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 47476
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1788 5536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Pascal
Code name AD107 GP104B
Launch date 2023 15 August 2016
Place in performance rating 167 290
Launch price (MSRP) $389.99
Price now $359.99
Type Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 43.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1755 MHz 1645 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2048
Pixel fill rate 56.16 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 140.4 GTexel/s 210.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 150 Watt
CUDA cores 1920
Floating-point performance 6,738 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C
Transistor count 7,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 256 GB / s
Memory bus width 96 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 8 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
SLI
Virtual Reality
VR Ready