NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 823 MHz
2.2x more boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 797 MHz
1376.5x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 122 Watt
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 422
3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 3808
5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 12778
Around 22% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 1466

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2023 vs 11 May 2013
Core clock speed	1455 MHz vs 823 MHz
Boost clock speed	1755 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.4 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 122 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	630 vs 422
PassMark - G3D Mark	14441 vs 3808
Geekbench - OpenCL	74538 vs 12778
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1788 vs 1466

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

630

422

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14441

3808

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

74538

12778

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1788

1466

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G2D Mark	630	422
PassMark - G3D Mark	14441	3808
Geekbench - OpenCL	74538	12778
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1788	1466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		78.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Code name	AD107	GK104
Launch date	2023	11 May 2013
Place in performance rating	167	725
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1755 MHz	797 MHz
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	823 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	8.986 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	1536
Pixel fill rate	56.16 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	140.4 GTexel/s	102.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt	122 Watt
CUDA cores		1536
Floating-point performance		2,448 gflops
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	IGP
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 API
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA