NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 643 vs 630
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15361 vs 14441
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 vs 74538
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2380 vs 1788
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 vs 630 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15361 vs 14441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 vs 74538 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 vs 1788 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 15361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 92696 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | 2380 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 167 | 81 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon 760M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs
IntelArc A530M
