NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 8.4x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 10 nm
Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 10 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1698 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 422.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | 3.379 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 1.690 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | 26.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compute units | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |