NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 41907
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 380
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 7539
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 152.235
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 10.681
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 115.607
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 644.098
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 1843.045

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 2302

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	101650 41907
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1081 380
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19722 7539
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2302 3656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	311.253 152.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.932 10.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	169.697 115.607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1500.926 644.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6622.553 1843.045

Compare specifications (specs)