NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 86% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2505 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 78% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2640 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 316.8 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 4 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 versus 41907
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 versus 380
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 versus 7539
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 versus 152.235
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 versus 10.681
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 versus 115.607
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 versus 644.098
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 versus 1843.045
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2023 versus 2 Apr 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2505 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2640 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 316.8 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 versus 41907 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 versus 380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 versus 7539 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 versus 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 versus 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 versus 644.098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 versus 1843.045 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 2302
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 200 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 2302 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 41907 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 7539 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 3656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 644.098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 1843.045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Nom de code | AD106 | TU117 |
| Date de sortie | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 75 | 267 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2640 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2505 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | 47.52 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 316.8 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
