NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 705 MHz
- 3x more boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 937.3x more texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 321.4x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 vs 22732
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 639
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 vs 8905
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 vs 66.419
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 vs 7.89
- 9.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 17.882
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 309.857
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 vs 1261.593
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 vs 22732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 vs 639 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 vs 8905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 vs 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 vs 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 vs 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 vs 309.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 vs 1261.593 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 3840
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 7.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 2302
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 2302 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 22732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 639 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 8905 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 17055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 309.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 1261.593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
Code name | AD106 | GK110B |
Launch date | 2023 | 28 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 75 | 336 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $1,580 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 705 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 375 Watt |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |