NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz
- 4.5x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 759 vs 711
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19586 vs 3678
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109087 vs 17562
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 319.688 vs 48.494
- 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.174 vs 3.96
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 62.405
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1585.54 vs 247.728
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 16 July 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1004 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 vs 711 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19586 vs 3678 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109087 vs 17562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 vs 48.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 vs 3.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 62.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 vs 247.728 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 | 711 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19586 | 3678 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109087 | 17562 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | 48.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | 3.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | 62.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 | 247.728 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | AD106 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 2023 | 16 July 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 80 | 546 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1004 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |