NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 515.3 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Around 12% higher pipelines: 9728 vs 8704
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27374 vs 25146
- Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4911 vs 4420
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180351 vs 167014
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 8704 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 320 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 10 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 vs 25146 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 vs 4420 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 vs 167014 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 982
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | 1053 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | 25146 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | 4420 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 | 167014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD103 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 39 | 56 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 8704 |
| Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 320 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
| Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6950 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
