NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and NVIDIA RTX A6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 11.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 982 vs 86
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27374 vs 4237
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4911 vs 4665
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 5 Oct 2020 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 vs 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 vs 4237 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 vs 4665 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 625.0 GTexel/s vs 515.3 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 10752 vs 9728
- 3x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 180351
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s vs 515.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10752 vs 9728 |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 vs 180351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 982 | 86 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27374 | 4237 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4911 | 4665 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180351 | 193937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD103 | GA102 |
Launch date | 2023 | 5 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | 100 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1860 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 32.98 TFLOPS | 40.00 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 9728 | 10752 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 208.3 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 515.3 GTexel/s | 625.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 45900 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin EPS |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 48 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |