NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 7.1x more texture fill rate: 1,491 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- 8.9x more pipelines: 18176 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 8 GB
- 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
Launch date | 2023 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2355 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1,491 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 18176 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 800 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 800 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
Code name | AD102 | GP104B |
Launch date | 2023 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 290 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2355 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,491 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 95.42 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 95.42 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 18176 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 504.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 1,491 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 800 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 1200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 16-pin | |
Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1,152 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |