NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 80 W
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1108 vs 612
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13714 vs 13619
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 80 W |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1108 vs 612 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13714 vs 13619 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76826 vs 72802
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 5815
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 vs 72802 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 vs 5815 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1108 | 612 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13714 | 13619 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72802 | 76826 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | 7412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 111 | 107 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 12000 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
