NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 4597.6x more texture fill rate: 369.6 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 7168 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 673
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21280 vs 6680
- 7.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 142326 vs 18372
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3196 vs 680
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 1664 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 673 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 vs 6680 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 vs 18372 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 vs 680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 673 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21280 | 6680 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 142326 | 18372 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3196 | 680 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA102 | GM204 |
Launch date | 23 Nov 2021 | 29 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 55 | 534 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 773 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 739.2 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 7168 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 369.6 GTexel/s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 1" (2.5 cm) |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 640.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |