NVIDIA T400 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1943.2x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 231
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3799 vs 766
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17251 vs 3424
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 13 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 vs 231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 vs 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17251 vs 3424 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | 231 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3799 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17251 | 3424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | TU117 | GF106 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 13 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 273 | 1355 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $46.56 | |
Price now | $46.56 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,170 million |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |