NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 1000M and NVIDIA NVS 2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 535 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 11.2 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 6.8x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 567 vs 140
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 152
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2327 vs 1249
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2327 vs 1249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 January 2011 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 535 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s vs 4.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 567 vs 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 152 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2327 vs 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2327 vs 1249 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 2100M
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2609 vs 2113
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 vs 2113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | NVIDIA NVS 2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 567 | 140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2113 | 2609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.218 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 207.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.149 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1633 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2327 | 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1633 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2327 | 1249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M | NVIDIA NVS 2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GT218 |
Launch date | 13 January 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $174.95 | |
Place in performance rating | 1449 | 1451 |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 535 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 4.28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |