NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro M3900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 300 and AMD FirePro M3900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 20 Watt
| Launch date | 8 January 2011 vs 19 October 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M3900
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 520 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4446 vs 2471
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 520 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 240 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4446 vs 2471 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 300
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M3900
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA NVS 300 | AMD FirePro M3900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 39 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 | 4446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 996 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 996 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA NVS 300 | AMD FirePro M3900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GT218 | Seymour |
| Launch date | 8 January 2011 | 19 October 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1660 | 1661 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 520 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 370 million |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | n / a | |
| Form factor | chip-down | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 14 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
