NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 310 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 58 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 790 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 vs 219
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 178 vs 45
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 vs 26 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 58 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 790 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 vs 219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 vs 45 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 523 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 144 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 881
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1686 vs 1229
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1686 vs 1229
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 vs 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 vs 1229 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 310
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | 219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 | 45 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 881 | 5892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.974 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 | 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G94 |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 | 26 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $79.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1586 | 1588 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 1360 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 144 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 58 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 156 mm | 6.6" (16.8 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 25.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 790 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |