NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 310 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 310
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 221
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 vs 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 37 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 1229
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 1229
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 1229 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 310
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 37 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 880 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.974 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 | 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 | 1640 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G96 |
Launch date | 26 June 2012 | 14 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $527 |
Place in performance rating | 1596 | 1599 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.4 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.184 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 156 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |