NVIDIA NVS 315 versus NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 315
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 25 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 versus 163
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.025 versus 2.566
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 79.479 versus 53.127
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.705 versus 4.47
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.573 versus 5.049
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 942 versus 764
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1382 versus 1131
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 942 versus 764
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1382 versus 1131
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2013 versus 2 April 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 versus 163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.025 versus 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.479 versus 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.705 versus 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.573 versus 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 942 versus 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1382 versus 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 942 versus 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1382 versus 1131 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1794 MHz versus 1750 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 versus 300
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1794 MHz versus 1750 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 320 versus 300 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 883 versus 882 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 300 | 320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 882 | 883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.025 | 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 79.479 | 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.705 | 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.573 | 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 942 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1382 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 465 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 942 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1382 | 1131 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA NVS 315 | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF119 | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2013 | 2 April 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1570 | 1571 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 523 MHz | 523 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 100.4 gflops | 100.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.184 GTexel / s | 4.184 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 292 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14 GB / s | 14.35 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz | 1794 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |