NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 460 MHz
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 4.184 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 38 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 302 vs 233
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 79
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1382 vs 858
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1382 vs 858

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 233
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 858
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 858

Compare specifications (specs)