NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 4200M and NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 425 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 287 vs 31
- 27x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1726 vs 64
- 27x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1726 vs 64
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 1 February 2006 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 287 vs 31 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 vs 64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 vs 64 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 83 vs 78
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 4200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 287 | 31 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 83 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 103.797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.836 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1726 | 64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1726 | 64 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 4200M | NVIDIA GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GF119 | C68 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 February 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1640 | 1638 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCI |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |