NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

NVIDIA NVS 510

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Around 77% better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1086 vs 701
Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2914 vs 1677
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 6.809
Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 111.269
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.399
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 3.385
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.3 vs 9.522
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1211
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1211

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 23 October 2012
Texture fill rate	22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1086 vs 701
Geekbench - OpenCL	2914 vs 1677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649 vs 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555 vs 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642 vs 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732 vs 3.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.3 vs 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892 vs 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892 vs 1211

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

Around 13% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 253
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 861
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1443
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 861
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1443

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	797 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	290 vs 253
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	976 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1720 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	976 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1720 vs 1443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1086

701

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

290

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2914

1677

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.649

6.809

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

174.555

111.269

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.642

0.399

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.732

3.385

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.3

9.522

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

976

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

1720

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1892

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

861

976

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1443

1720

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G3D Mark	1086	701
PassMark - G2D Mark	253	290
Geekbench - OpenCL	2914	1677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649	6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555	111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.642	0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.732	3.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	16.3	9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	861	976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1443	1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	861	976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1443	1720
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M	NVIDIA NVS 510
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Launch date	23 July 2013	23 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$109.94	$449
Place in performance rating	1435	1438
Price now	$79
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	17.59
Technical info
Core clock speed	706 MHz	797 MHz
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops	306.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	22.59 GTexel / s	12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		160 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	44.8 GB / s	28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus