NVIDIA NVS 5200M versus AMD Radeon E6460
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 5200M and AMD Radeon E6460 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5200M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 672 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 10.75 GTexel / s versus 4.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.0 gflops versus 192 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 513 versus 324
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 versus 1.616
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 versus 104.843
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.539 versus 0.225
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 versus 4.942
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1099 versus 801
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 versus 1925
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1099 versus 801
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 versus 1925
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2012 versus 7 April 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.75 GTexel / s versus 4.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 258.0 gflops versus 192 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 513 versus 324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 versus 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 189.966 versus 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 versus 0.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.643 versus 4.942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1099 versus 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 versus 1925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1099 versus 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 versus 1925 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E6460
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 160 versus 96
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 3140 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 189
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 versus 16.851
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 531 versus 222
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 531 versus 222
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 160 versus 96 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 3140 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 versus 16.851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 531 versus 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 531 versus 222 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon E6460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 513 | 324 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.829 | 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 189.966 | 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.539 | 0.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.643 | 4.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.851 | 18.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 222 | 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1099 | 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2715 | 1925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 222 | 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1099 | 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2715 | 1925 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA NVS 5200M | AMD Radeon E6460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF108 | Caicos |
Date de sortie | 17 September 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1515 | 1517 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | 600 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 258.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 160 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.75 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 370 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.12 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3140 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |