NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5200M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 10.75 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• Around 92% better floating-point performance: 258.0 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 513 vs 424
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 188
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2197 vs 1163
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.829 vs 3.121
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 109.787
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.643 vs 5.005
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.851 vs 8.55
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2715 vs 1626
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2715 vs 1626

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 2% higher maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 1 GB
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 660 vs 222
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 1099
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 660 vs 222
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 1099

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	513 424
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	189 188
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2197 1163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.829 3.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.966 109.787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.643 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.851 8.55
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1626
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222 660
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1099 1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2715 1626

Compare specifications (specs)