NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 7650A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 569
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.429
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.435
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 621
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 700
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 621
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 700

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A

• Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 188
• 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 2045
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 229.562
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 11.384
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 19.696

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	625 569
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	188 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2045 9507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.068 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.562 259.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.384 13.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.696 53.841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 700

Compare specifications (specs)