NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 7650A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 569
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.429
  • Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.435
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 621
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 700
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 621
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 700
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 5 January 2012
Core clock speed 660 MHz vs 600 MHz
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 626 vs 569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 vs 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 vs 0.435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 vs 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 vs 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 vs 700

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7650A

  • Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
  • 2.3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
  • Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 187
  • 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 2070
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.825 vs 229.562
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.298 vs 11.384
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.841 vs 19.696
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 96
Floating-point performance 576.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 287 vs 187
Geekbench - OpenCL 9507 vs 2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 259.825 vs 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.298 vs 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 53.841 vs 19.696

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7650A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
626
569
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
187
287
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
9507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.068
4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
229.562
259.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.635
0.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.384
13.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.696
53.841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
700
Name NVIDIA NVS 5400M AMD Radeon HD 7650A
PassMark - G3D Mark 626 569
PassMark - G2D Mark 187 287
Geekbench - OpenCL 2070 9507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 4.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 229.562 259.825
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 0.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.384 13.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.696 53.841
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 700
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 621
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 700

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 5400M AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Onega
Launch date 1 June 2012 5 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1445 1448
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $262
Price now $262
Value for money (0-100) 3.94

Technical info

Core clock speed 660 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 253.4 gflops 576.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 480
Texture fill rate 10.56 GTexel / s 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus