NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 427
  • Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2070 vs 1091
  • Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 3.109
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 199.164
  • Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.333
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 10.489
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 905
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 905
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed 660 MHz vs 500 MHz
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 626 vs 427
Geekbench - OpenCL 2070 vs 1091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 vs 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 229.562 vs 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 vs 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.384 vs 10.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1069 vs 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1069 vs 905

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

  • Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
  • 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
  • Around 89% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 187
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 19.696
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1652
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2282
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1652
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2282
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines 400 vs 96
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 35 Watt
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 190 vs 187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.722 vs 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1797 vs 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2352 vs 2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1797 vs 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2352 vs 2282

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
626
427
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
187
190
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2070
1091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.068
3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
229.562
199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.635
0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.384
10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.696
42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1069
905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1069
905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1652
1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2282
2352
Name NVIDIA NVS 5400M AMD Radeon HD 7570M
PassMark - G3D Mark 626 427
PassMark - G2D Mark 187 190
Geekbench - OpenCL 2070 1091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.068 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 229.562 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.384 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.696 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1069 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1069 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 2352

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA NVS 5400M AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Thames
Launch date 1 June 2012 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1445 1447
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 660 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 253.4 gflops 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 400
Texture fill rate 10.56 GTexel / s 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 716 million
Boost clock speed 650 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5 / DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus