NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 626 vs 427
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2070 vs 1091
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 3.109
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 199.164
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.333
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 10.489
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 905
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 905
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 626 vs 427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2070 vs 1091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 vs 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 vs 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 vs 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 vs 10.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 vs 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 vs 905 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- Around 89% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 187
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 19.696
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1652
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2282
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1652
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2282
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 vs 187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.722 vs 19.696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1797 vs 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2352 vs 2282 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 vs 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 vs 2282 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 626 | 427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2070 | 1091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.068 | 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 | 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.384 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 | 42.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1069 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 | 2352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1069 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 | 2352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 5400M | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Thames |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1445 | 1447 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |