NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 5400M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 427
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2085 vs 1085
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 3.109
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 199.164
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.333
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.384 vs 10.489
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 905
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 905

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• Around 89% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 187
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 19.696
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1797 vs 1652
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2282
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 vs 1652
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2282

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	625 427
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 190
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2085 1085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.068 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	229.562 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.635 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.384 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.696 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1069 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1652 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2282 2352

Compare specifications (specs)