NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• Around 74% better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 653 vs 624
• Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3687 vs 2101
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 vs 5.068
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 vs 0.635
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 vs 11.384
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 vs 19.696
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 vs 1069
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 vs 2282
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 vs 1069
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 vs 2282

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 129
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 151.304
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 1426
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 1426

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	653 624
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	129 187
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 2101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.572 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.304 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.808 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.943 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.301 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1524 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1426 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 2282

Compare specifications (specs)