NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 810 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 83.04 GTexel / s
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 81 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24237 vs 19029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 vs 7 October 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 83.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 81 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 vs 19029 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 2x 512
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2x 2 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5699 vs 1190
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 295
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 2x 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2x 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5699 vs 1190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 810
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1190 | 5699 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 | 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 | 19029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 303 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 810 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 | 7 October 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 583 | 584 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,058 gflops | 2,657 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 512 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec | 83.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 81 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 8x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 14.4 GB / s | 120 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |