NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 380

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 970 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 3,476 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 190 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 8.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 970 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 6081
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 58.135
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1503.633
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 7635
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 7635

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 251
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 36174
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1680
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1680
• 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2791 vs 899

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6724 6081
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	251 653
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36174 76397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 58.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1503.633
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7635
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	899 2791

Compare specifications (specs)