NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M and ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 16x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 155.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 5
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 January 2011 vs 31 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Rage 7 |
Code name | GF106 | RV250 |
Launch date | 13 January 2011 | 31 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $46.56 | |
Place in performance rating | 1352 | 1355 |
Price now | $46.56 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 7.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 450 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |